Do Violent Video Games Cause Youth Violence Media Essay

Do Violent Video Games Cause Youth Violence Media Essay During the last years, the popularity of violent video games has increased significantly. Consequently, parents and teachers have become worried that these violent videogames may contribute or cause youth violence. These games have been blamed for school shootings, juvenile crime and sexist violence. In addition, the criticism towards violent video games from the media, and the parental community are so continuous, the causal connection between the videogames and violence has been accepted as an absolute reality. But the truth is another. Patrick Kierkegaard, a PhD student at Nottingham University, revised the researches and investigations on this matter, and published his conclusions in the magazine International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry. In his work, he questions if there is scientific evidence that states that violent videogames contribute to violence or aggressive behavior, and the truth of the matter is: there is none. He also notes that if a connection between playing violent videogames and the activation of the regions of the brain associated with violence is produced, is not grounds for establishing a strong, proven and evident bond between the players attitude while playing the game and his behavior in real life. Furthermore, he states that there is no relationship between juvenile violence and the increasing sales of violent video games. In fact the effect seems to be the opposite, it looks like violent video games have decreased violence, but this theory hasnt been proven either. Moreover, Kierkegaard shows concrete data and statistics, such as, the reduction of violent crime in the United States, since the 90Â ´s, particularly among the youth, while video games have gained a lot of popularity and use, and he adds with millions of violent video games sold, the world should be experiencing a breakout of violence, instead, violence has decreased (Kierkegaard). And then there is this: In 2005, the US had 2,279 murders committed by teenagers compared to 73 in Japan. Per capita, video game sales were $5.20 in the US compared to $47 in Japan. This example illustrates that there is no correlation between violent behavior and playing video games. Duke Ferris published an article in Game Revolution titled The Truth About Violent Youth and Video Games. The author, a video game programmer doesnt take an academic approach to this issue, but uses official sources to support his point. In his article he says that over 300 studies have been conducted to see the effects of violent media, 30 of them studied video games. The majority did not find anything, but some found a correlation between violence and violent media. Now, even if this was true, correlation is not the same as causation. The reason for these results, according to the author, is that violent people are attracted to violent media. Blaming violent media would be like going to the opera, noticing that most people there are rich, and concluding that opera makes people rich (Ferris). Another point that Ferris presents, is an analysis of the risk factors of youth violence by the Surgeon General of the United States of America. In this analysis violent media was classified as small effect size, and other factors such as, socioeconomic status, academic failure, poor parent-child relations, weak social ties, and just being male were rated as higher risk factors than violent media exposure. Additionally correlation between violent video games and youth violence was proven to be ineffective by judge Consuelo Callahan, in Video Software Dealers Association v. Schwarzenegger. In this trial, Schwarzenegger claimed that violent video games cause neurological and psychological harm, but the evidence presented was a study that showed just a correlation to which Callahan responded, In sum, the evidence presented by the State does not support the Legislatures purported interest. Nearly all of the research is based on correlation, not evidence of causation. (Callahan). Callahan also wrote that the research presented, did not show any link regarding causation of neurological or psychological harm by violent video games. The ruling favored the video software association. Steven Johnson wrote an article for Los Angeles times. In this article, he talks about Hillary Clinton vs. the Xbox: Game Over. In his article he commends Senator Clinton for proposing a $90 million study on the effects of violent video games on children, and for her courageous stand against Grand Theft Auto videogames, this obviously is sarcasm because then he says he would like Clinton to put her attention in another game whose nonstop violence has caught the attention of millions of children, this game, he writes, plants violent thought on its players and some of these players have gone to the real world and committed acts of violence and sexual assault (Johnson). He was talking about football. In addition he suggests that congress should focus in these facts: The last 10 years have seen the release of many popular violent games, including Quake and Grand Theft Auto, at this same time violent crime has decreased. According to Duke Universitys Child Well-Being Index, todays kids are less violent than kids have been at any time since the study began in 1975. (Johnson). In addition, Johnson believes that violent video games are actually good for peoples brain. For example he says that playing video games provides the player a cognitive training to the mind, and it develops mental skills as important as skills developed while reading books. The exercises that the internet, video games, and even movies offer, explain the increase in the intellectual coefficients of North Americans. Games and movies played and watched today would have been considered much complicated for the audience of thirty years ago, but now they capture the attention of millions of people. Finally, he sugges ts that violent videogames have been demonized by people who tend to generalize everything, just like the same thing when cars or rock and roll music first appeared. To conclude, the majority of violent video games players are old enough to understand the difference between the game and real life; therefore, they will not emulate the actions that the characters in their games do, nor will they rob banks, kill, or go to war. Its clear that violent video games do not cause violence. The real causes of violence are: depression, family problems, and just aggressive traits. The evidence that shows a correlation between games and violent video games are not effective to prove such games are harmful to children or cause violence. Parents and individuals who protest against these type of entertainment, should focus on the real causes of youth violence and not point fingers without informing themselves properly

Essay --

MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS There are great insights to the managers. As the research is conducted to find out the three main objectives which are as follows: 1.) To investigate how socio-demographic (age, income and occupation) affect consumers attitude towards online shopping. 2.) To probe how the pattern of online buying (types of goods, e-commerce experience and hours use on internet) influence consumers attitude towards online shopping. 3.)To examine how purchase perception (product perception, customer service and consumer risk) influence consumers attitude towards online shopping. As the level of significance is taken as 5% throughout the full research; The results of the research on the basis of gender are as follows: 1.) Gender is independent of weekly usage of the internet because the result of hypothesis testing for this is 0.666 which is greater than 0.05. Hence, gender is not responsible for the weekly usage of the internet. 2.) Gender is independent of intention of the online purchase because the result of hypothesis testing for this is 0.910 which is greater than 0.05. Hence, gender is not responsible for the intention of the online purchase. 3.) Gender is independent of frequency of purchases because the result of hypothesis testing for this is 0.457 which is greater than 0.05. Hence, gender is not responsible for the frequency of purchases. 4.) Gender is independent of online product purchase because the result of hypothesis testing for this is 0.566 which is greater than 0.05. Hence, gender is not responsible for the online product purchase. 5.) Gender is independent of internet experience because the result of hypothesis testing for this is 0.401 which is greater than 0.05. Hence, gender is n... ... income is not responsible for the weekly usage of the internet. 2.) Income is independent of intention of the online purchase because the result of hypothesis testing for this is 0.893 which is greater than 0.05. Hence, income is not responsible for the intention of the online purchase. 3.) Income is independent of frequency of purchases because the result of hypothesis testing for this is 0.901 which is greater than 0.05. Hence, income is not responsible for the frequency of purchases. 4.) Income is dependent of online product purchase because the result of hypothesis testing for this is 0.037 which is less than 0.05. Hence, income is responsible for the online product purchase. 5.) Income is dependent of internet experience because the result of hypothesis testing for this is 0.012 which is less than 0.05. Hence, income is responsible for the internet experience.

Mr. Franklin and mr. Lyndon discuss the virtuous life.

Dear Son, It is with great pleasure and gratitude for your most recent missive, received this third day of October, that I must write at once in the hope of conveying the most unusual and perhaps enlightening conversation I entertained last evening at the home of one, Mr. Charles B. Lyndon, of Concord and New York, though how Mr. Lyndon explains the bifurcation of his very self leads me to wonder if he might be a Papist in Puritan woolens, given the Roman belief in the bi-location of their many saints.Suffice it to say such thoughts of sainthood and the conduct precedent to such an exalted (dare I say, unenlightened) station stands within this correspondence very close to the topic we held under discussion at the wide oak table in Mr. Lyndon’s kitchen, accompanied by his daughter, Elizabeth, on the retirement of his wife, Matilda. Mr. Lyndon and I and his daughter (Mr.Lyndon being a progressive soul in many ways, who saw no reason why his daughter should not be included in our after-dinner discussion, though of course she was not allowed to smoke tobacco) set about like Socrates’ devotees with the proposition stated admirably by my host that the virtuous life is one that can be lived (though his exact word was the imprecise â€Å"attained’) with an exercise of constant vigilance, diligence and hard, hard work.Far be it from me to openly argue with a host whose very wife had fed me so well, yet I was struck so with the open and apparent inconsistency and contradiction hidden in plain sight, that I rose from my chair, walked about the kitchen with my hands behind my back, leaned into the table, lowered myself so that my face rested like a balloon on a string but a few inches from Mr. Lyndon’s nose and, with the boldness that has served me so well in life, despite a ruffled feather here or there, I uttered the expletive †balderdash,† and re-took my seat.Mr. Lyndon’s daughter, the plain but intelligent Elizabeth, held her hand to her lips as her father nearly sputtered his surprise, though without displeasure. Perhaps he believes us to be better acquainted than we are and relies upon that familiarity, real or apparent, to afford him the easier avenue of good humor rather than the more difficult and adversarial stance taken on by the lightly insulted. â€Å"Your reasoning, Mr.Franklin,† he said, the question implicit in the salutation, and I set about framing my argument as one sets about building a house that will withstand summer’s heat and winter’s cold. â€Å"Are you a Papist, Mr. Lyndon,† I asked, and he sat back, again surprised if not outright offended, and replied, â€Å"No, sir. You know that I am a member of the First Congregational Church of Lexington, and a proud member at that. † â€Å"Then Mr.Lyndon,† I said, â€Å"Insofar as you and your loved ones are members in good standing in a church that clearly subscribes to the enlightened and refo rmative principles of the Great Reformation, which find their genesis in the theology of the late German monk, and his revolutionary reading of Paul’s Letter to the †¦Ã¢â‚¬  I hesitated on purpose. â€Å"Romans,† Elizabeth said which afforded me a desired alliance in the middle-game of our discussion. â€Å"Yes, Romans it is,† I said, continuing on, preparing my lance for the final assault on the citadel of proud humanism’s excesses, â€Å"Then, Mr.Lyndon, my fine host, how can you say in the face of Luther’s doctrine of salvation by faith and not by works that the road to virtue is the one set down by laborers, sweating their earth-bound bodies in some vain attempt, like the ancients of Babel, to obtain some blessed state by dint of human, and therefore ultimately corruptible effort. † Mr. Lyndon sat back in his chair, while his daughter’s eyes, tawny with candlelight did not leave me. Only silence was our companion, silence an d from time to time a brush of the wind through trees bare and dressed only with autumn’s wind.â€Å"Then, my good friend,† Mr. Lyndon rejoined in sur-reply, â€Å"allowing for the theology of two hundred years or more, drafted by a man who died with a legacy of troubles, if not shame, how do you suggest that one live a virtuous life?. † I told him that he was a brilliant host and that his generosity was only matched by his daughter’s considerable beauty and that having been the beneficiary of his kindness, his wife’s cooking and his daughter’s fond company, I would set forth my findings as follows.Virtues are but the white angels who sit across the balance of the more popular and burned umber of the seven deadly sins: Pride, Envy, Anger, Lust, Avarice, Gluttony and Sloth. I said that although we who admit to some belief, the nature, width and depth thereof known to no one, not even ourselves, despite all proclamations to the contrary, are b y reason of our fallen natures, far more conversant with the left handed path of the more exotic predispositions to sin than we are to the more rigorous climbs to virtue.Therefore, to live the virtuous life one must enter the realms of gold through the back door known well to God’s most humble servants and on the occasion of our entrance argue that we were not so much virtuous in this life, poor vessels of grace doled out by an often chary God, as we were masters of avoidance, such that despite the siren call of experience and its joys, real or false, lasting or short-lived, the measure of our virtue can only be assessed by the evil we did not do, rather than by the good we tried to do.â€Å"That is wrong,† Mr. Lyndon said. â€Å"Truly you don’t mean that, Mr. Franklin. † â€Å"Perhaps not, Mr. Lyndon,† I said, â€Å"and yet between the two alternatives well framed by this enjoyable discussion, I will opt for that statement which sounds in humilit y concerning the struggle not to sin, rather than swab these meaty arms with the subtle and oily brush of pride that accompanies all claims to virtue. † Yours Very Truly, Father I read a good deal of Franklin’s writing out loud and allowed the â€Å"ear† to do the work of imitation.Any comedian will tell you the ear is the agent of mimicry. Sight, i. e. , analysis is a distant second. I tried to visualize an 18th century candlelit evening, after dinner, and then listened to the voices of the â€Å"actors† as they discussed with all the benevolence (real or not) and grace of sitting congressmen an issue on which they disagreed. I set it in the form of a letter so as to afford Franklin an ironic point of view.

Communication Within Millennials - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 625 Downloads: 8 Date added: 2019/08/02 Category Sociology Essay Level High school Topics: Millennials Essay Did you like this example? Communication Within Millennials Before the invention of the telegraph in 1844 by Samuel Morse a message traveled through the bodys oral cavity and right into the earlobe. Today individuals communicate via email, social media messaging, texting, and types of technology that avoids instant responses and the anxiety of being in the presence of another person. The approach of communication has changed a lot due to technology. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Communication Within Millennials" essay for you Create order With the great increase in mobile technology and smartphone usage comes the question of how communication has been negatively changed as a result. Millennials have grown up developing communication skills with people by talking with them mostly in person and over the phone, they have had to rewire their lives when technology boomed all over the world. In todays generation, we portray poor communication skills because we are focusing on communicating mainly through texting and social media. In an Atlantic article, A New Kind of Social Anxiety in the Classroom, Alexandra Ossola reveals the idea that younger children have been using certain aspects of technology to avoid the building social skills. It has been debated that some smartphone owners go on their phone to avoid certain aspects of everyday conversation. After a while, people become accustomed to looking at their phone to communicate, rather than talking with someone else in person. This habit can make people feel uncomfortable with talking to others in person, and disrupt the connection and bonding that could have been. Alexandra stresses the importance of communication among society, we each need to feel a sense of belonging. With the growing technology businesses and corporation, the need to connect in person is slowly fading as you can now reach out to someone with a few clicks of a button. Along with Alexandra, Rachel Zahatis also shares her opinion regarding the decline in communication in the Chicago Tribune article,   Technology ruins communication. She believes solely in the idea that, Human beings are innately social creatures and we need to continue to stress the importance of stepping away from the screens long enough to make connections with others. This issue of turning to smartphones in any spare moment leads to the problem that smartphones cause with everyday conversations. People become less accustomed to focusing on the present and lose sight of the importance of face-to-face communication. When people develop the habit of taking out their phones at any free period, they lose the drive to communicate with people in person because the vast capabilities of the device are more stimulating than the conversations. Once communication is lost, connections are lost. Rachel Zahatis also stresses about communication within the workplace. There are managers who ask for a text message reminding them of an event or to change an employees availability. Facebook groups that are created for swapping shifts discourage any personal conversations with my co-workers outside of the workplace. I have even had managers communicate with me via Facebook about work-related issues. There also is an extreme discomfort to interview for a job because that would require long conversations and interpersonal communication skills. Outside of the workplace, communication is even worse. We, as a society, have become so dependent on cell phones, text messaging and social media that we do not even know how to connect with friends. One-on-one conversations are terrifying and phone calls are absolutely taboo. If one does venture out of the technological bubble for coffee with a close friend it is a sure-fire thing that the cell phone is sitting face-up on the table, right next to the cup. We walk through this world with our heads down. Immersed in the technological realm, we disregard the real. We converse with our hands rather than our mouths, tapping keyboards and touchpads to the rhythm of our thoughts.